CVE-2012-0022
What it is
Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.35, 6.x before 6.0.34, and 7.x before 7.0.23 uses an inefficient approach for handling parameters, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a request that contains many parameters and parameter values, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-4858.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 10.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 10.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.0 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 10.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-189
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.0
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.1
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.2
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.3
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.4
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.5
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.6
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.7
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2012-0022.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2012-0022. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-5.html
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-5.html
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html
References
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2012-01/0112.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=132871655717248&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133294394108746&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=136485229118404&w=2
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0074.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0075.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0076.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0077.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0078.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0325.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0345.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1331.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48213
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48549
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48790
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48791
- http://secunia.com/advisories/50863
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-5.html
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html
- http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2401
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2012:085
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:150
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujan2013-1515902.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/51447