CVE-2011-5064
What it is
DigestAuthenticator.java in the HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 uses Catalina as the hard-coded server secret (aka private key), which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging knowledge of this string, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 6.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 6.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.3 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 6.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-310
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.0
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.1
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.2
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.3
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.4
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.5
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.6
- Apache Tomcat 5.5.7
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-5064.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-5064. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1087655
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1158180
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1159309
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-5.html
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1087655
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1158180
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1159309
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-5.html
References
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-02/msg00002.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-02/msg00006.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=139344343412337&w=2
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0074.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0075.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0076.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0077.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0078.html
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0325.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/57126
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1087655
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1158180
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=1159309
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-5.html
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-6.html
- http://tomcat.apache.org/security-7.html
- http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2401
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-1845.html
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/06cfb634bc7bf37af7d8f760f118018746ad8efbd519c4b789ac9c2e%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8dcaf7c3894d66cb717646ea1504ea6e300021c85bb4e677dc16b1aa%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r3aacc40356defc3f248aa504b1e48e819dd0471a0a83349080c6bcbf%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r584a714f141eff7b1c358d4679288177bd4ca4558e9999d15867d4b5%40%3Cdev.tomcat.apache.org%3E
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-02/msg00002.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-02/msg00006.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=139344343412337&w=2