CVE-2011-4362
What it is
Integer signedness error in the base64_decode function in the HTTP authentication functionality (http_auth.c) in lighttpd 1.4 before 1.4.30 and 1.5 before SVN revision 2806 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (segmentation fault) via crafted base64 input that triggers an out-of-bounds read with a negative index.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 21.1% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 21.1% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.0 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 21.1% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Lighttpd < 1.4.30
- Lighttpd 1.5.0
- Debian Linux 5.0
- Debian Linux 6.0
- Debian Linux 7.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-4362.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-4362. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://download.lighttpd.net/lighttpd/security/lighttpd_sa_2011_01.txt
- http://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/2370
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/29/13
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/29/8
- http://download.lighttpd.net/lighttpd/security/lighttpd_sa_2011_01.txt
- http://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/2370
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/29/13
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/29/8
References
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2011-12/0167.html
- http://blog.pi3.com.pl/?p=277
- http://download.lighttpd.net/lighttpd/security/lighttpd_sa_2011_01.txt
- http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN37417423/index.html
- http://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/2370
- http://secunia.com/advisories/47260
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2368
- http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/18295
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/29/13
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/29/8
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026359
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758624
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/71536
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2011-12/0167.html
- http://blog.pi3.com.pl/?p=277
- http://download.lighttpd.net/lighttpd/security/lighttpd_sa_2011_01.txt
- http://jvn.jp/en/jp/JVN37417423/index.html
- http://redmine.lighttpd.net/issues/2370
- http://secunia.com/advisories/47260
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2368
- http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/18295
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/29/13
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/11/29/8
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1026359
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=758624