CVE-2011-4136
What it is
django.contrib.sessions in Django before 1.2.7 and 1.3.x before 1.3.1, when session data is stored in the cache, uses the root namespace for both session identifiers and application-data keys, which allows remote attackers to modify a session by triggering use of a key that is equal to that session's identifier.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 2.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-20 · Improper input validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Djangoproject Django ≤ 1.2.6
- Djangoproject Django 0.91
- Djangoproject Django 0.95
- Djangoproject Django 0.95.1
- Djangoproject Django 0.96
- Djangoproject Django 1.0
- Djangoproject Django 1.0.1
- Djangoproject Django 1.0.2
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-4136.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-4136. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/09/11/1
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/09/13/2
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737366
- https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/09/
- https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/10/127/
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/09/11/1
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/09/13/2
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737366
- https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/09/
- https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/10/127/
References
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/09/11/1
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/09/13/2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/46614
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2332
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737366
- https://hermes.opensuse.org/messages/14700881
- https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/09/
- https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/10/127/
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/09/11/1
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/09/13/2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/46614
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2332
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737366
- https://hermes.opensuse.org/messages/14700881
- https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/09/
- https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2011/sep/10/127/