CVE-2011-2943
What it is
The irc_msg_who function in msgs.c in the IRC protocol plugin in libpurple 2.8.0 through 2.9.0 in Pidgin before 2.10.0 does not properly validate characters in nicknames, which allows user-assisted remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and application crash) via a crafted nickname that is not properly handled in a WHO response.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 3.6% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 3.6% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.3 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 3.6% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Pidgin Libpurple 2.8.0
- Pidgin Libpurple 2.9.0
- Pidgin ≤ 2.9.0
- Pidgin 2.0.0
- Pidgin 2.0.1
- Pidgin 2.0.2
- Pidgin 2.1.0
- Pidgin 2.1.1
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-2943.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-2943. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://developer.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/diff/5749f9193063800d27bef75c2388f6f9cc2f7f37/with/5c2dba4a7e2e76b76e7f472b88953a4316706d43/libpurple/protocols/irc/msgs.c
- http://developer.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/info/5c2dba4a7e2e76b76e7f472b88953a4316706d43
- http://pidgin.im/news/security/?id=53
- http://secunia.com/advisories/45663
- http://developer.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/diff/5749f9193063800d27bef75c2388f6f9cc2f7f37/with/5c2dba4a7e2e76b76e7f472b88953a4316706d43/libpurple/protocols/irc/msgs.c
- http://developer.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/info/5c2dba4a7e2e76b76e7f472b88953a4316706d43
- http://pidgin.im/news/security/?id=53
- http://secunia.com/advisories/45663
References
- http://developer.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/diff/5749f9193063800d27bef75c2388f6f9cc2f7f37/with/5c2dba4a7e2e76b76e7f472b88953a4316706d43/libpurple/protocols/irc/msgs.c
- http://developer.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/info/5c2dba4a7e2e76b76e7f472b88953a4316706d43
- http://pidgin.im/news/security/?id=53
- http://secunia.com/advisories/45663
- http://secunia.com/advisories/45916
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1025961
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/08/20/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/08/22/2
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/49268
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722939
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/69340
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A18005
- http://developer.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/diff/5749f9193063800d27bef75c2388f6f9cc2f7f37/with/5c2dba4a7e2e76b76e7f472b88953a4316706d43/libpurple/protocols/irc/msgs.c
- http://developer.pidgin.im/viewmtn/revision/info/5c2dba4a7e2e76b76e7f472b88953a4316706d43
- http://pidgin.im/news/security/?id=53
- http://secunia.com/advisories/45663
- http://secunia.com/advisories/45916
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1025961
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/08/20/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/08/22/2
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/49268
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722939
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/69340
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A18005