CVE-2011-2705
What it is
The SecureRandom.random_bytes function in lib/securerandom.rb in Ruby before 1.8.7-p352 and 1.9.x before 1.9.2-p290 relies on PID values for initialization, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to predict the result string by leveraging knowledge of random strings obtained in an earlier process with the same PID.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 2.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.0 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-20 · Improper input validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- ruby-lang Ruby ≤ 1.8.7-334
- ruby-lang Ruby 1.8.7
- ruby-lang Ruby 1.8.7-160
- ruby-lang Ruby 1.8.7-173
- ruby-lang Ruby 1.8.7-248
- ruby-lang Ruby 1.8.7-249
- ruby-lang Ruby 1.8.7-299
- ruby-lang Ruby 1.8.7-302
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-2705.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-2705. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-July/063062.html
- http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=revision&revision=32050
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/11/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/12/14
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/20/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/20/16
- http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2011/07/02/ruby-1-8-7-p352-released/
- http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2011/07/15/ruby-1-9-2-p290-is-released/
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722415
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-July/063062.html
References
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-July/063062.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-July/063071.html
- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4579
- http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=revision&revision=32050
- http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_8_7_352/ChangeLog
- http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_9_2_290/ChangeLog
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/11/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/12/14
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/20/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/20/16
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-1581.html
- http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2011/07/02/ruby-1-8-7-p352-released/
- http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2011/07/15/ruby-1-9-2-p290-is-released/
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/49015
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722415
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-July/063062.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-July/063071.html
- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4579
- http://svn.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi?view=revision&revision=32050
- http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_8_7_352/ChangeLog
- http://svn.ruby-lang.org/repos/ruby/tags/v1_9_2_290/ChangeLog
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/11/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/12/14
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/20/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/07/20/16