CVE-2011-2591
What it is
Multiple buffer overflows in the Provideo ActiveX controls allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted input fields, as demonstrated by (1) a long strIp argument to the voice method in 2way.dll in the alarm 1.0.3.1 ActiveX control, (2) a network response to AXPlayer.ocx in the GMAXPlayer 2.0.8.2 ActiveX control, the (3) UserName or (4) Password parameter to AXPlayer.ocx in the GMAXPlayer 2.0.8.2 ActiveX control, (5) a long Id parameter to the GetString method in PAxPlayer.ocx in the PAxPlayer 3.0.0.9 ActiveX control, or (6) a long strAdr parameter to the ConnectIPCam method in PAxPlayer.ocx in the PAxPlayer 3.0.0.9 ActiveX control.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 5.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 5.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 9.3 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 5.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Provideo Alarm Activex Control 3.0.0.9
- Provideo Gmax Activex Control 2.0.8.2
- Provideo Paxplayer Activex Control 3.0.0.9
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 9.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-2591.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-2591. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-56/
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-57/
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-58/
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-56/
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-57/
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-58/
References
- http://osvdb.org/74310
- http://osvdb.org/74311
- http://osvdb.org/74312
- http://osvdb.org/74313
- http://osvdb.org/74314
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-56/
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-57/
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-58/
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/48977
- http://osvdb.org/74310
- http://osvdb.org/74311
- http://osvdb.org/74312
- http://osvdb.org/74313
- http://osvdb.org/74314
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-56/
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-57/
- http://secunia.com/secunia_research/2011-58/
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/48977