CVE-2011-2178
What it is
The virSecurityManagerGetPrivateData function in security/security_manager.c in libvirt 0.8.8 through 0.9.1 uses the wrong argument for a sizeof call, which causes incorrect processing of "security manager private data" that "reopens disk probing" and might allow guest OS users to read arbitrary files on the host OS. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of a CVE-2010-2238 regression.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine with a login. High risk of data exposure.
- Exploit odds
- 0.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.4 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Redhat Libvirt 0.8.8
- Redhat Libvirt 0.9.0
- Redhat Libvirt 0.9.1
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.4
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:M/Au:S/C:C/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-2178.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-2178. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709769
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-May/msg01935.html
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709769
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-May/msg01935.html
References
- http://libvirt.org/news.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-July/062515.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2011-06/msg00030.html
- http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2011/CVE-2011-2178.html
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1152-1
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709769
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709775
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-May/msg01935.html
- http://libvirt.org/news.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-July/062515.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2011-06/msg00030.html
- http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-security/cve/2011/CVE-2011-2178.html
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1152-1
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709769
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709775
- https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2011-May/msg01935.html