CVE-2011-1928
What it is
The fnmatch implementation in apr_fnmatch.c in the Apache Portable Runtime (APR) library 1.4.3 and 1.4.4, and the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.18, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via a URI that does not match unspecified types of wildcard patterns, as demonstrated by attacks against mod_autoindex in httpd when a /*/WEB-INF/ configuration pattern is used. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2011-0419.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 10.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 10.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.3 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 10.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-399
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Apache apr-util 1.4.3
- Apache apr-util 1.4.4
- Apache Http Server 2.2.18
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-1928.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-1928. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44558
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44661
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/1289
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/1290
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44558
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44661
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/1289
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/1290
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627182
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-11/msg00011.html
- http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-announce/201105.mbox/%3C4DD55092.3030403%40apache.org%3E
- http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-announce/201105.mbox/%3c4DD55076.1060005%40apache.org%3e
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=134987041210674&w=2
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/05/19/10
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/05/19/5
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44558
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44613
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44661
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44780
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48308
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:095
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0844.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/1289
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/1290
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51219
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627182
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-11/msg00011.html
- http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-announce/201105.mbox/%3C4DD55092.3030403%40apache.org%3E
- http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-announce/201105.mbox/%3c4DD55076.1060005%40apache.org%3e
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=134987041210674&w=2
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/05/19/10
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/05/19/5
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44558