CVE-2011-1499
What it is
acl.c in Tinyproxy before 1.8.3, when an Allow configuration setting specifies a CIDR block, permits TCP connections from all IP addresses, which makes it easier for remote attackers to hide the origin of web traffic by leveraging the open HTTP proxy server.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 1.8% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.8% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 2.6 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.8% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-16
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Banu Tinyproxy ≤ 1.8.2
- Banu Tinyproxy 1.5.0
- Banu Tinyproxy 1.5.1
- Banu Tinyproxy 1.5.2
- Banu Tinyproxy 1.5.3
- Banu Tinyproxy 1.6.0
- Banu Tinyproxy 1.6.1
- Banu Tinyproxy 1.6.2
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 2.6
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-1499.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-1499. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621493
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694658
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621493
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694658
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621493
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/04/07/9
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/04/08/3
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44274
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2222
- https://banu.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90
- https://banu.com/cgit/tinyproxy/diff/?id=e8426f6662dc467bd1d827100481b95d9a4a23e4
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694658
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/67256
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=621493
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/04/07/9
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/04/08/3
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44274
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2222
- https://banu.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90
- https://banu.com/cgit/tinyproxy/diff/?id=e8426f6662dc467bd1d827100481b95d9a4a23e4
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694658
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/67256