CVE-2011-1093
What it is
The dccp_rcv_state_process function in net/dccp/input.c in the Datagram Congestion Control Protocol (DCCP) implementation in the Linux kernel before 2.6.38 does not properly handle packets for a CLOSED endpoint, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and OOPS) by sending a DCCP-Close packet followed by a DCCP-Reset packet.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 3.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 3.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.8 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 3.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-476 · NULL pointer dereference
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Linux Kernel < 2.6.38
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Aus 5.6
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Desktop 5.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Eus 5.6
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Server 5.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Workstation 5.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-1093.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-1093. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/08/19
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/08/4
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682954
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/08/19
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/08/4
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682954
References
- http://downloads.avaya.com/css/P8/documents/100145416
- http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=720dc34bbbe9493c7bd48b2243058b4e447a929d
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/08/19
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/08/4
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0833.html
- http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.38
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46793
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682954
- http://downloads.avaya.com/css/P8/documents/100145416
- http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=720dc34bbbe9493c7bd48b2243058b4e447a929d
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/08/19
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/08/4
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0833.html
- http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ChangeLog-2.6.38
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46793
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=682954