CVE-2011-1083
What it is
The epoll implementation in the Linux kernel 2.6.37.2 and earlier does not properly traverse a tree of epoll file descriptors, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a crafted application that makes epoll_create and epoll_ctl system calls.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 0.8% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.8% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.9 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.8% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-400 · Uncontrolled resource consumption
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Linux Kernel ≤ 2.6.37.2
- Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop 11
- Suse Linux Enterprise Server 11
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Desktop 6.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Server 6.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Workstation 6.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.9
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-1083.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-1083. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/02/1
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/02/2
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681578
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/02/1
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/02/2
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681578
References
- http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1105744
- http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1105888
- http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1106686
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-04/msg00021.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-05/msg00013.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/02/1
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/02/2
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0862.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43522
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48115
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48410
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48898
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48964
- http://www.osvdb.org/71265
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681578
- http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1105744
- http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1105888
- http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1106686
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-04/msg00021.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2012-05/msg00013.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/02/1
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/02/2
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0862.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43522
- http://secunia.com/advisories/48115