CVE-2011-1071
What it is
The GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) before 2.12.2 and Embedded GLIBC (EGLIBC) allow context-dependent attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via a long UTF8 string that is used in an fnmatch call, aka a "stack extension attack," a related issue to CVE-2010-2898, CVE-2010-1917, and CVE-2007-4782, as originally reported for use of this library by Google Chrome.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 14.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 14.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.1 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 14.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-399
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Gnu Eglibc
- Gnu Glibc ≤ 2.12.1
- Gnu Glibc 1.00
- Gnu Glibc 1.01
- Gnu Glibc 1.02
- Gnu Glibc 1.03
- Gnu Glibc 1.04
- Gnu Glibc 1.05
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.1
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-1071.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-1071. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Feb/644
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43492
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43830
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43989
- http://secunia.com/advisories/46397
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0412.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0413.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0863
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681054
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Feb/644
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/615120
- http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=48733
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/26/3
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/28/11
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/28/15
- http://scarybeastsecurity.blogspot.com/2011/02/i-got-accidental-code-execution-via.html
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Feb/635
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Feb/644
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43492
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43830
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43989
- http://secunia.com/advisories/46397
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8175
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1025290
- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11883
- http://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=f15ce4d8dc139523fe0c273580b604b2453acba6
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:178
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0412.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0413.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/520102/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46563
- http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2011-0012.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0863
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681054
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A12853