CVE-2011-1022
What it is
The cgre_receive_netlink_msg function in daemon/cgrulesengd.c in cgrulesengd in the Control Group Configuration Library (aka libcgroup or libcg) before 0.37.1 does not verify that netlink messages originated in the kernel, which allows local users to bypass intended resource restrictions via a crafted message.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 2.1 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-264
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Balbir Singh Libcgroup ≤ 0.37
- Balbir Singh Libcgroup 0.1b
- Balbir Singh Libcgroup 0.1c
- Balbir Singh Libcgroup 0.2
- Balbir Singh Libcgroup 0.3
- Balbir Singh Libcgroup 0.31
- Balbir Singh Libcgroup 0.32
- Balbir Singh Libcgroup 0.32.1
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 2.1
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-1022.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-1022. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615987
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/25/11
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/25/12
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/25/6
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/25/9
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43611
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43758
- http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=26598749
- http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=27102603
- http://sourceforge.net/projects/libcg/files/libcgroup/v0.37.1/libcgroup-0.37.1.tar.bz2/download
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615987
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/056683.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/056734.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-updates/2011-04/msg00027.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/25/11
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/25/12
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/25/14
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/25/6
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/25/9
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43611
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43758
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43891
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44093
- http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=26598749
- http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=27102603
- http://sourceforge.net/projects/libcg/files/libcgroup/v0.37.1/libcgroup-0.37.1.tar.bz2/download
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2193
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0320.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46578
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025157
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0679
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0774
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680409
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615987
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/056683.html