CVE-2011-1007
What it is
Best Practical Solutions RT before 3.8.9 does not perform certain redirect actions upon a login, which allows physically proximate attackers to obtain credentials by resubmitting the login form via the back button of a web browser on an unattended workstation after an RT logout.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 2.1 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-255
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Bestpractical Rt ≤ 3.8.9
- Bestpractical Rt 1.0.0
- Bestpractical Rt 1.0.1
- Bestpractical Rt 1.0.2
- Bestpractical Rt 1.0.3
- Bestpractical Rt 1.0.4
- Bestpractical Rt 1.0.5
- Bestpractical Rt 1.0.6
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 2.1
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-1007.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-1007. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614575
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-February/000186.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/22/12
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/22/16
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/22/6
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43438
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0475
- https://github.com/bestpractical/rt/commit/057552287159e801535e59b8fbd5bd98d1322069
- https://github.com/bestpractical/rt/commit/917c211820590950f7eb0521f7f43b31aeed44c4
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614575
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614575
- http://issues.bestpractical.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=15804
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-February/000186.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/22/12
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/22/16
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/22/6
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/23/22
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/24/7
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/24/8
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/24/9
- http://osvdb.org/71012
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43438
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0475
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/65771
- https://github.com/bestpractical/rt/commit/057552287159e801535e59b8fbd5bd98d1322069
- https://github.com/bestpractical/rt/commit/917c211820590950f7eb0521f7f43b31aeed44c4
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614575
- http://issues.bestpractical.com/Ticket/Display.html?id=15804
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-February/000186.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/22/12
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/22/16
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/22/6
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/23/22
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/02/24/7