CVE-2011-0997
What it is
dhclient in ISC DHCP 3.0.x through 4.2.x before 4.2.1-P1, 3.1-ESV before 3.1-ESV-R1, and 4.1-ESV before 4.1-ESV-R2 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in a hostname obtained from a DHCP message, as demonstrated by a hostname that is provided to dhclient-script.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 84.6% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 84.6% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 84.6% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-20 · Improper input validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Isc Dhcp 3.0
- Isc Dhcp 3.0.1
- Isc Dhcp 3.0.2
- Isc Dhcp 3.0.3
- Isc Dhcp 3.0.4
- Isc Dhcp 3.0.5
- Isc Dhcp 3.0.6
- Isc Dhcp 3.1-esv
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-0997.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-0997. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689832
- https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/advisories/cve-2011-0997
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689832
- https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/advisories/cve-2011-0997
References
- http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10761
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-April/057888.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-April/058279.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133226187115472&w=2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44037
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44048
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44089
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44090
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44103
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44127
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44180
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201301-06.xml
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1025300
- http://slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2011&m=slackware-security.593345
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2216
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2217
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/107886
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:073
- http://www.osvdb.org/71493
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0428.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0840.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47176
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1108-1
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0879
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0886