CVE-2011-0695
What it is
Race condition in the cm_work_handler function in the InfiniBand driver (drivers/infiniband/core/cma.c) in Linux kernel 2.6.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (panic) by sending an InfiniBand request while other request handlers are still running, which triggers an invalid pointer dereference.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited from the same network segment without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 1.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.7 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-362 · Race condition
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Linux Kernel ≤ 2.6.39.4
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Desktop 5.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Eus 5.6
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Server 5.0
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Server Aus 5.6
- Redhat Enterprise Linux Workstation 5.0
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 8.04
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.7
- Attack vector
- Adjacent network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:A/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-0695.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-0695. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/11/1
- http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg07447.html
- http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg07448.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/11/1
- http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg07447.html
- http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg07448.html
References
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0927.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43693
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/11/1
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46839
- http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg07447.html
- http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg07448.html
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1146-1
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66056
- http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-0927.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43693
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/03/11/1
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46839
- http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg07447.html
- http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rdma/msg07448.html
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1146-1
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66056