CVE-2011-0530
What it is
Buffer overflow in the mainloop function in nbd-server.c in the server in Network Block Device (nbd) before 2.9.20 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long request. NOTE: this issue exists because of a CVE-2005-3534 regression.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 5.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 5.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 5.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Wouter Verhelst Nbd ≤ 2.9.19
- Wouter Verhelst Nbd 2.9.0
- Wouter Verhelst Nbd 2.9.1
- Wouter Verhelst Nbd 2.9.2
- Wouter Verhelst Nbd 2.9.3
- Wouter Verhelst Nbd 2.9.4
- Wouter Verhelst Nbd 2.9.5
- Wouter Verhelst Nbd 2.9.6
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-0530.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-0530. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-February/054071.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-February/054083.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/28/3
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/31/7
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43353
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0403
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673562
- https://github.com/yoe/nbd/commit/3ef52043861ab16352d49af89e048ba6339d6df8
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-February/054071.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-February/054083.html
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611187
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-February/054071.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-February/054083.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-04/msg00000.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/28/3
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/31/7
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43353
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43610
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201206-35.xml
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2183
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46572
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0403
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0582
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673562
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/65720
- https://github.com/yoe/nbd/commit/3ef52043861ab16352d49af89e048ba6339d6df8
- https://hermes.opensuse.org/messages/8086846
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611187
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-February/054071.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-February/054083.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-04/msg00000.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/28/3
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/31/7
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43353
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43610