CVE-2011-0020
What it is
Heap-based buffer overflow in the pango_ft2_font_render_box_glyph function in pango/pangoft2-render.c in libpango in Pango 1.28.3 and earlier, when the FreeType2 backend is enabled, allows user-assisted remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted font file, related to the glyph box for an FT_Bitmap object.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 18.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 18.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.6 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 18.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Gnome Pango ≤ 1.28.3
- Gnome Pango 1.28.0
- Gnome Pango 1.28.1
- Gnome Pango 1.28.2
- Pango 0.20
- Pango 0.21
- Pango 0.22
- Pango 0.23
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.6
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-0020.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-0020. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
References
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-04/msg00000.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/18/6
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/20/2
- http://osvdb.org/70596
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42934
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43100
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0180.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45842
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024994
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0186
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0238
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pango1.0/+bug/696616
- https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639882
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671122
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/64832
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-04/msg00000.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/18/6
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/20/2
- http://osvdb.org/70596
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42934
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43100
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0180.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45842
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024994
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0186