CVE-2011-0014
What it is
ssl/t1_lib.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8h through 0.9.8q and 1.0.0 through 1.0.0c allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash), and possibly obtain sensitive information in applications that use OpenSSL, via a malformed ClientHello handshake message that triggers an out-of-bounds memory access, aka "OCSP stapling vulnerability."
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 9.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 9.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.0 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 9.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-399
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- OpenSSL 0.9.8h
- OpenSSL 0.9.8i
- OpenSSL 0.9.8j
- OpenSSL 0.9.8k
- OpenSSL 0.9.8l
- OpenSSL 0.9.8m
- OpenSSL 0.9.8n
- OpenSSL 0.9.8o
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-0014.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-0014. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43227
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43286
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43301
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43339
- http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20110208.txt
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0361
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0387
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0389
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0395
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0399
References
- http://ftp.netbsd.org/pub/NetBSD/security/advisories/NetBSD-SA2011-002.txt.asc
- http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c02794777
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2011//Jun/msg00000.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-February/054007.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-04/msg00000.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=130497251507577&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=131042179515633&w=2
- http://osvdb.org/70847
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43227
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43286
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43301
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43339
- http://secunia.com/advisories/44269
- http://secunia.com/advisories/57353
- http://slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2011&m=slackware-security.668823
- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4723
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S1004564
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2162
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:028
- http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20110208.txt
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0677.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/46264
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1025050
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1064-1
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0361