CVE-2011-0010
What it is
check.c in sudo 1.7.x before 1.7.4p5, when a Runas group is configured, does not require a password for command execution that involves a gid change but no uid change, which allows local users to bypass an intended authentication requirement via the -g option to a sudo command.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 0.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.4 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-264
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Todd Miller Sudo 1.7.0
- Todd Miller Sudo 1.7.1
- Todd Miller Sudo 1.7.2
- Todd Miller Sudo 1.7.2p1
- Todd Miller Sudo 1.7.2p2
- Todd Miller Sudo 1.7.2p3
- Todd Miller Sudo 1.7.2p4
- Todd Miller Sudo 1.7.2p5
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.4
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-0010.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-0010. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/11/3
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/12/1
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42886
- http://www.sudo.ws/repos/sudo/rev/07d1b0ce530e
- http://www.sudo.ws/repos/sudo/rev/fe8a94f96542
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0089
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668879
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/11/3
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/12/1
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42886
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609641
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-January/053263.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-January/053341.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-01/msg00006.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/11/3
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/12/1
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/01/12/3
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42886
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42949
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42968
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43068
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43282
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201203-06.xml
- http://slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2011&m=slackware-security.593654
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:018
- http://www.osvdb.org/70400
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0599.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45774
- http://www.sudo.ws/repos/sudo/rev/07d1b0ce530e
- http://www.sudo.ws/repos/sudo/rev/fe8a94f96542
- http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/alerts/runas_group_pw.html
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1046-1
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0089
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0182
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0195