CVE-2011-0009
What it is
Best Practical Solutions RT 3.x before 3.8.9rc2 and 4.x before 4.0.0rc4 uses the MD5 algorithm for password hashes, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to determine cleartext passwords via a brute-force attack on the database.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 1.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.3 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-310
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Bestpractical Rt ≤ 3.8.9
- Bestpractical Rt 3.0.0
- Bestpractical Rt 3.0.1
- Bestpractical Rt 3.0.2
- Bestpractical Rt 3.0.3
- Bestpractical Rt 3.0.4
- Bestpractical Rt 3.0.5
- Bestpractical Rt 3.0.6
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2011-0009.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2011-0009. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610850
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-January/000185.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43438
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0190
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0475
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0576
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672250
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610850
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-January/000185.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43438
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610850
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-January/000185.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/054740.html
- http://osvdb.org/70661
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43438
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2150
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45959
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0190
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0475
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0576
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672250
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610850
- http://lists.bestpractical.com/pipermail/rt-announce/2011-January/000185.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/054740.html
- http://osvdb.org/70661
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43438
- http://www.debian.org/security/2011/dsa-2150
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45959
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0190
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0475
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0576
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672250
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf9fa47ab66495c78bb4120b0754dd9531ca2ff0430f6685ac9b07772%40%3Cdev.mina.apache.org%3E