CVE-2010-4265
What it is
The org.jboss.remoting.transport.bisocket.BisocketServerInvoker$SecondaryServerSocketThread.run method in JBoss Remoting 2.2.x before 2.2.3.SP4 and 2.5.x before 2.5.3.SP2 in Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (aka JBoss EAP or JBEAP) 4.3 through 4.3.0.CP09 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) by establishing a bisocket control connection TCP session, and then not sending any application data, related to a missing CVE-2010-3862 patch. NOTE: this can be considered a duplicate of CVE-2010-3862 because a missing patch should not be assigned a separate CVE identifier.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 2.1% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 2.1% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 2.6 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 2.1% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Redhat Jboss Remoting 2.2.0
- Redhat Jboss Remoting 2.2.2
- Redhat Jboss Remoting 2.2.3
- Redhat Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 4.3.0
- Redhat Jboss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1.0
- Redhat Jboss Enterprise Web Platform 5.1.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 2.6
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-4265.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-4265. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0964.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0965.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0964.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0965.html
References
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1024840
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0964.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0965.html
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660623
- https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-5253
- https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBREM-1261
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1024840
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0964.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0965.html
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660623
- https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-5253
- https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBREM-1261