CVE-2010-4255
What it is
The fixup_page_fault function in arch/x86/traps.c in Xen 4.0.1 and earlier on 64-bit platforms, when paravirtualization is enabled, does not verify that kernel mode is used to call the handle_gdt_ldt_mapping_fault function, which allows guest OS users to cause a denial of service (host OS BUG_ON) via a crafted memory access.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited from the same network segment without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 0.8% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.8% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 6.1 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.8% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Citrix Xen ≤ 4.0.1
- Citrix Xen 3.0.2
- Citrix Xen 3.0.3
- Citrix Xen 3.0.4
- Citrix Xen 3.1.2
- Citrix Xen 3.1.3
- Citrix Xen 3.1.4
- Citrix Xen 3.2.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 6.1
- Attack vector
- Adjacent network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:A/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-4255.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-4255. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-11/msg01650.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/30/5
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/30/8
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658155
- http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-11/msg01650.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/30/5
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/30/8
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658155
References
- http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-11/msg01650.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/30/5
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/30/8
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42884
- http://secunia.com/advisories/46397
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0017.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/520102/100/0/threaded
- http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2011-0012.html
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658155
- http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-11/msg01650.html
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/30/5
- http://openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/30/8
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42884
- http://secunia.com/advisories/46397
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0017.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/520102/100/0/threaded
- http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2011-0012.html
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658155