CVE-2010-4252
What it is
OpenSSL before 1.0.0c, when J-PAKE is enabled, does not properly validate the public parameters in the J-PAKE protocol, which allows remote attackers to bypass the need for knowledge of the shared secret, and successfully authenticate, by sending crafted values in each round of the protocol.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 8.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 8.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 8.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-287 · Improper authentication
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- OpenSSL ≤ 1.0.0b
- OpenSSL 0.9.1c
- OpenSSL 0.9.2b
- OpenSSL 0.9.3
- OpenSSL 0.9.3a
- OpenSSL 0.9.4
- OpenSSL 0.9.5
- OpenSSL 0.9.5a
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-4252.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-4252. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=20098
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42469
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3120
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3122
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659297
- https://github.com/seb-m/jpake
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=20098
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42469
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3120
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3122
References
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=20098
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=129916880600544&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=130497251507577&w=2
- http://openssl.org/news/secadv_20101202.txt
- http://seb.dbzteam.org/crypto/jpake-session-key-retrieval.pdf
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42469
- http://secunia.com/advisories/57353
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1024823
- http://slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2010&m=slackware-security.668471
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S1004564
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45163
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3120
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3122
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659297
- https://github.com/seb-m/jpake
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A19039
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=20098
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=129916880600544&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=130497251507577&w=2
- http://openssl.org/news/secadv_20101202.txt
- http://seb.dbzteam.org/crypto/jpake-session-key-retrieval.pdf
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42469
- http://secunia.com/advisories/57353
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1024823
- http://slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2010&m=slackware-security.668471