CVE-2010-4247
What it is
The do_block_io_op function in (1) drivers/xen/blkback/blkback.c and (2) drivers/xen/blktap/blktap.c in Xen before 3.4.0 for the Linux kernel 2.6.18, and possibly other versions, allows guest OS users to cause a denial of service (infinite loop and CPU consumption) via a large production request index to the blkback or blktap back-end drivers. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited from the same network segment with a login. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 0.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.5 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-20 · Improper input validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Citrix Xen ≤ 3.3.2
- Citrix Xen 3.0.2
- Citrix Xen 3.0.3
- Citrix Xen 3.0.4
- Citrix Xen 3.1.3
- Citrix Xen 3.1.4
- Citrix Xen 3.2.0
- Citrix Xen 3.2.1
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.5
- Attack vector
- Adjacent network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:A/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-4247.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-4247. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35093
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/23/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/24/8
- http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg?rev/7070d34f251c
- http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg?rev/77f831cbb91d
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656206
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35093
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/23/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/24/8
- http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg?rev/7070d34f251c
References
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35093
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42789
- http://secunia.com/advisories/46397
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/23/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/24/8
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0004.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/520102/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45029
- http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2011-0012.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0024
- http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg?rev/7070d34f251c
- http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg?rev/77f831cbb91d
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656206
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35093
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42789
- http://secunia.com/advisories/46397
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/23/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/24/8
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0004.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/520102/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45029
- http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2011-0012.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0024
- http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg?rev/7070d34f251c
- http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg?rev/77f831cbb91d