CVE-2010-4180
What it is
OpenSSL before 0.9.8q, and 1.0.x before 1.0.0c, when SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG is enabled, does not properly prevent modification of the ciphersuite in the session cache, which allows remote attackers to force the downgrade to an unintended cipher via vectors involving sniffing network traffic to discover a session identifier.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 9.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 9.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.3 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 9.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- OpenSSL < 0.9.8q
- OpenSSL < 1.0.0c
- Fedoraproject Fedora 13
- Fedoraproject Fedora 14
- Debian Linux 5.0
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 6.06
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 8.04
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 9.04
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-4180.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-4180. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=20131
- http://openssl.org/news/secadv_20101202.txt
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0896.html
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659462
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=20131
- http://openssl.org/news/secadv_20101202.txt
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-0896.html
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=659462
References
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=20131
- http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c02794777
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2011//Jun/msg00000.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-December/052027.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-December/052315.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-01/msg00003.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-05/msg00005.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-07/msg00013.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-07/msg00014.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=129916880600544&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=130497251507577&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=132077688910227&w=2
- http://openssl.org/news/secadv_20101202.txt
- http://osvdb.org/69565
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42469
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42473
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42493
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42571
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42620
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42811
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42877
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43169
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43170
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43171
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43172