CVE-2010-4165
What it is
The do_tcp_setsockopt function in net/ipv4/tcp.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.37-rc2 does not properly restrict TCP_MAXSEG (aka MSS) values, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (OOPS) via a setsockopt call that specifies a small value, leading to a divide-by-zero error or incorrect use of a signed integer.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 1.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.9 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-369
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Linux Kernel < 2.6.37
- Linux Kernel 2.6.37
- Opensuse 11.2
- Opensuse 11.3
- Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop 11
- Suse Linux Enterprise Real Time Extension 11
- Suse Linux Enterprise Server 11
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.9
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-4165.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-4165. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/12/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/12/4
- http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg146405.html
- http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg146495.html
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652508
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/12/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/12/4
- http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg146405.html
- http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg146495.html
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652508
References
- http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=7a1abd08d52fdeddb3e9a5a33f2f15cc6a5674d2
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-01/msg00000.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-01/msg00001.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-01/msg00004.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-02/msg00000.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42778
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42801
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42932
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8111
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8123
- http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/ChangeLog-2.6.37-rc2
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:029
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:051
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/12/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/11/12/4
- http://www.osvdb.org/69241
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/44830
- http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg146405.html
- http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg146495.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0012
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0124
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0298
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652508
- http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=7a1abd08d52fdeddb3e9a5a33f2f15cc6a5674d2
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-01/msg00000.html