CVE-2010-4051
What it is
The regcomp implementation in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) through 2.11.3, and 2.12.x through 2.12.2, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) via a regular expression containing adjacent bounded repetitions that bypass the intended RE_DUP_MAX limitation, as demonstrated by a {10,}{10,}{10,}{10,}{10,} sequence in the proftpd.gnu.c exploit for ProFTPD, related to a "RE_DUP_MAX overflow."
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 40.0% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 40.0% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.0 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 40.0% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Gnu Glibc 1.00
- Gnu Glibc 1.01
- Gnu Glibc 1.02
- Gnu Glibc 1.03
- Gnu Glibc 1.04
- Gnu Glibc 1.05
- Gnu Glibc 1.06
- Gnu Glibc 1.07
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-4051.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-4051. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://cxib.net/stuff/proftpd.gnu.c
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42547
- http://cxib.net/stuff/proftpd.gnu.c
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42547
References
- http://cxib.net/stuff/proftpd.gnu.c
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jan/78
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42547
- http://securityreason.com/achievement_securityalert/93
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8003
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1024832
- http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/15935
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/912279
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/515589/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45233
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645859
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc713534b10f9daeee2e0990239fa407e2118e4aa9e88a7041177497c%40%3Cissues.guacamole.apache.org%3E
- http://cxib.net/stuff/proftpd.gnu.c
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2011/Jan/78
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42547
- http://securityreason.com/achievement_securityalert/93
- http://securityreason.com/securityalert/8003
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1024832
- http://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/15935
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/912279
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/515589/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/45233
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645859
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rc713534b10f9daeee2e0990239fa407e2118e4aa9e88a7041177497c%40%3Cissues.guacamole.apache.org%3E