CVE-2010-3441
What it is
Multiple buffer overflows in abcm2ps before 5.9.12 might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted input file, related to the PUT0 and PUT1 output macros; (2) a crafted input file, related to the trim_title function; and possibly (3) a long -O option on a command line.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 5.9% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 5.9% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 5.9% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-120 · Classic buffer overflow
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Moinejf abcm2ps < 5.9.12
- Fedoraproject Fedora 14
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-3441.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-3441. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/04/08/5
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/04/08/6
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/04/08/7
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580435
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/04/08/5
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/04/08/6
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/04/08/7
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580435
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577014
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-February/054015.html
- http://moinejf.free.fr/abcm2ps-5.txt
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39345
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43338
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/04/08/5
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/04/08/6
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/04/08/7
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/39271
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0390
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580435
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577014
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-February/054015.html
- http://moinejf.free.fr/abcm2ps-5.txt
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39345
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43338
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/04/08/5
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/04/08/6
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/04/08/7
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/39271
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0390
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580435