CVE-2010-3312
What it is
Epiphany 2.28 and 2.29, when WebKit and LibSoup are used, unconditionally displays a closed-lock icon for any URL beginning with the https: substring, without any warning to the user, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary https web sites via a crafted X.509 server certificate.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 1.0% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.0% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.0% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Gnome Epiphany 2.28
- Gnome Epiphany 2.29
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-3312.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-3312. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://blog.fefe.de/?ts=b26ca29d
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564690
- http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=154330
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-12/msg00000.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-01/msg00006.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43068
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/17/10
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/17/12
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/17/13
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/17/5
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/17/6
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/20/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/21/5
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0212
- https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600663
- http://blog.fefe.de/?ts=b26ca29d
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=564690
- http://bugzilla-attachments.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=154330
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-12/msg00000.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2011-01/msg00006.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43068
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/17/10
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/17/12
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/17/13
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/17/5