CVE-2010-3192
What it is
Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 1.6% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.6% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.0 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.6% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-200 · Information exposure
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Gnu Glibc < 2.26
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-3192.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-3192. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Apr/399
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/25/8
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/6
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/31/7
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/3
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/4
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/09/02/5