CVE-2010-3069
What it is
Stack-based buffer overflow in the (1) sid_parse and (2) dom_sid_parse functions in Samba before 3.5.5 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted Windows Security ID (SID) on a file share.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 10.1% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 10.1% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 10.1% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Samba ≤ 3.3.14
- Samba < 3.4.9
- Samba < 3.5.5
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 6.06
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 8.04
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 9.04
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 9.10
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 10.04
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-3069.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-3069. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://us1.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.5.5.html
- http://us1.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2010-3069.html
- http://us1.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.5.5.html
- http://us1.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2010-3069.html
References
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2011//Jun/msg00000.html
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2011/Mar/msg00006.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-September/047650.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-September/047697.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-September/047758.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-10/msg00000.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-10/msg00006.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=130835366526620&w=2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/41354
- http://secunia.com/advisories/41447
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42531
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42885
- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4581
- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4723
- http://us1.samba.org/samba/history/samba-3.5.5.html
- http://us1.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2010-3069.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0860.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/515055/100/0/threaded
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/43212
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024434
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-987-1
- http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2010-0019.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2378
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3126
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0091