CVE-2010-2939
What it is
Double free vulnerability in the ssl3_get_key_exchange function in the OpenSSL client (ssl/s3_clnt.c) in OpenSSL 1.0.0a, 0.9.8, 0.9.7, and possibly other versions, when using ECDH, allows context-dependent attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via a crafted private key with an invalid prime. NOTE: some sources refer to this as a use-after-free issue.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 10.0% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 10.0% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.3 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 10.0% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-399
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- OpenSSL 0.9.7
- OpenSSL 0.9.8
- OpenSSL 1.0.0a
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-2939.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-2939. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40906
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2038
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40906
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2038
References
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-11/msg00005.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=130331363227777&w=2
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Aug/84
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40906
- http://secunia.com/advisories/41105
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42309
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42413
- http://secunia.com/advisories/43312
- http://security.FreeBSD.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-10:10.openssl.asc
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1024296
- http://slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2010&m=slackware-security.668793
- http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2100
- http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev%40openssl.org/msg28043.html
- http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev%40openssl.org/msg28045.html
- http://www.mail-archive.com/openssl-dev%40openssl.org/msg28049.html
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/08/11/6
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/516397/100/0/threaded
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-1003-1
- http://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2011-0003.html
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2038
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2229
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3077
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-11/msg00005.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=130331363227777&w=2
- http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2010/Aug/84