CVE-2010-2074
What it is
istream.c in w3m 0.5.2 and possibly other versions, when ssl_verify_server is enabled, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the (1) subject's Common Name or (2) Subject Alternative Name field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 1.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 1.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 6.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 1.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-20 · Improper input validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- w3m 0.5.2
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 6.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-2074.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-2074. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40134
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1467
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40134
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1467
References
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-July/044401.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-08/msg00001.html
- http://osvdb.org/65538
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40134
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40733
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/06/14/4
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0565.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40837
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024252
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1467
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1879
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1928
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-July/044401.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-08/msg00001.html
- http://osvdb.org/65538
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40134
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40733
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/06/14/4
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0565.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40837
- http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1024252
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1467
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1879
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1928