CVE-2010-2055
What it is
Ghostscript 8.71 and earlier reads initialization files from the current working directory, which allows local users to execute arbitrary PostScript commands via a Trojan horse file, related to improper support for the -P- option to the gs program, as demonstrated using gs_init.ps, a different vulnerability than CVE-2010-4820.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 0.5% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.5% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.2 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.5% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-17
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Artifex Afpl Ghostscript 6.0
- Artifex Afpl Ghostscript 6.01
- Artifex Afpl Ghostscript 6.50
- Artifex Afpl Ghostscript 7.00
- Artifex Afpl Ghostscript 7.03
- Artifex Afpl Ghostscript 7.04
- Artifex Afpl Ghostscript 8.00
- Artifex Afpl Ghostscript 8.11
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.2
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-2055.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-2055. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40452
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40475
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40532
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1757
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599564
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40452
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40475
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40532
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1757
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599564
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583183
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583316
- http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691339
- http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691350
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-July/043913.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-July/043948.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-08/msg00001.html
- http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=6368
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40452
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40475
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40532
- http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-201412-17.xml
- http://www.osvdb.org/66247
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/511433
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/511472
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/511474
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/511476
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1757
- https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608071
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=599564
- https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0095.html
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583183
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583316
- http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691339
- http://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=691350