CVE-2010-1172
What it is
DBus-GLib 0.73 disregards the access flag of exported GObject properties, which allows local users to bypass intended access restrictions and possibly cause a denial of service by modifying properties, as demonstrated by properties of the (1) DeviceKit-Power, (2) NetworkManager, and (3) ModemManager services.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 0.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 3.6 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-264
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Freedesktop dbus-glib 0.73
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 3.6
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-1172.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-1172. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://cgit.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus-glib/commit/?h=rhel5&id=9a6bce9b615abca6068348c1606ba8eaf13d9ae0
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40908
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40925
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2063
- http://cgit.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus-glib/commit/?h=rhel5&id=9a6bce9b615abca6068348c1606ba8eaf13d9ae0
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40908
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40925
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2063
References
- http://cgit.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus-glib/commit/?h=rhel5&id=9a6bce9b615abca6068348c1606ba8eaf13d9ae0
- http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-10/msg00006.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-11/msg00001.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-11/msg00006.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40908
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40925
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42397
- http://support.avaya.com/css/P8/documents/100113103
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0616.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/42347
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/2063
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3097
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585394
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/61041
- http://cgit.freedesktop.org/dbus/dbus-glib/commit/?h=rhel5&id=9a6bce9b615abca6068348c1606ba8eaf13d9ae0
- http://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content&id=JSA10705
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-10/msg00006.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-11/msg00001.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-11/msg00006.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40908
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40925
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42397
- http://support.avaya.com/css/P8/documents/100113103
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0616.html