CVE-2010-0926
What it is
The default configuration of smbd in Samba before 3.3.11, 3.4.x before 3.4.6, and 3.5.x before 3.5.0rc3, when a writable share exists, allows remote authenticated users to leverage a directory traversal vulnerability, and access arbitrary files, by using the symlink command in smbclient to create a symlink containing .. (dot dot) sequences, related to the combination of the unix extensions and wide links options.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network with a login. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 30.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 30.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 3.5 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 30.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-22 · Path traversal
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Samba 3.3.0
- Samba 3.3.1
- Samba 3.3.2
- Samba 3.3.3
- Samba 3.3.4
- Samba 3.3.5
- Samba 3.3.6
- Samba 3.3.7
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 3.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-0926.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-0926. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.samba.org/samba/news/symlink_attack.html
- http://www.samba.org/samba/news/symlink_attack.html
References
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2010-02/0083.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2010-02/0107.html
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/fulldisclosure/2010-02/0108.html
- http://blog.metasploit.com/2010/02/exploiting-samba-symlink-traversal.html
- http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=bd269443e311d96ef495a9db47d1b95eb83bb8f4
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-04/msg00001.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-08/msg00001.html
- http://marc.info/?l=full-disclosure&m=126538598820903&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=126539592603079&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=126540402215620&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=126540733320471&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=126545363428745&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=126777580624790&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126539387432412&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126540011609753&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126540100511357&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126540248613395&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126540277713815&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126540290614053&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126540376915283&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126540475116511&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126540477016522&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126540539117328&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126540608318301&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=samba-technical&m=126540695819735&w=2