CVE-2010-0742
What it is
The Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) implementation in crypto/cms/cms_asn1.c in OpenSSL before 0.9.8o and 1.x before 1.0.0a does not properly handle structures that contain OriginatorInfo, which allows context-dependent attackers to modify invalid memory locations or conduct double-free attacks, and possibly execute arbitrary code, via unspecified vectors.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 7.8% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 7.8% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.5 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 7.8% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-310
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- OpenSSL ≤ 0.9.8n
- OpenSSL 0.9.1c
- OpenSSL 0.9.2b
- OpenSSL 0.9.3
- OpenSSL 0.9.3a
- OpenSSL 0.9.4
- OpenSSL 0.9.5
- OpenSSL 0.9.5a
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-0742.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-0742. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40000
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40024
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1313
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40000
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40024
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1313
References
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19693
- http://cvs.openssl.org/filediff?f=openssl/crypto/cms/cms_asn1.c&v1=1.8&v2=1.8.6.1
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=129138643405740&w=2
- http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2211&user=guest&pass=guest
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40000
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40024
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42457
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42724
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42733
- http://secunia.com/advisories/57353
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=ssg1S1004564
- http://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20100601.txt
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/40502
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1313
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/3105
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598738
- https://kb.bluecoat.com/index?page=content&id=SA50
- https://lists.balabit.com/pipermail/syslog-ng-announce/2011-January/000101.html
- https://lists.balabit.com/pipermail/syslog-ng-announce/2011-January/000102.html
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A12395
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19693
- http://cvs.openssl.org/filediff?f=openssl/crypto/cms/cms_asn1.c&v1=1.8&v2=1.8.6.1
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=129138643405740&w=2
- http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2211&user=guest&pass=guest
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40000