CVE-2010-0733
What it is
Integer overflow in src/backend/executor/nodeHash.c in PostgreSQL 8.4.1 and earlier, and 8.5 through 8.5alpha2, allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a SELECT statement with many LEFT JOIN clauses, related to certain hashtable size calculations.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network with a login. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 6.8% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 6.8% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 3.5 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 6.8% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-189
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- PostgreSQL ≤ 8.4.1
- PostgreSQL 8.0
- PostgreSQL 8.0.0
- PostgreSQL 8.0.1
- PostgreSQL 8.0.2
- PostgreSQL 8.0.3
- PostgreSQL 8.0.4
- PostgreSQL 8.0.5
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 3.5
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- Single
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-0733.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-0733. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546621
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546621
References
- http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-10/msg00277.php
- http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-10/msg00287.php
- http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-10/msg00289.php
- http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-10/msg00310.php
- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=64b057e6823655fb6c5d1f24a28f236b94dd6c54
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-08/msg00001.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39820
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/03/09/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/03/16/10
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0427.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0428.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0429.html
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/38619
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/1197
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546621
- https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A10691
- http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-10/msg00277.php
- http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-10/msg00287.php
- http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-10/msg00289.php
- http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-10/msg00310.php
- http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=64b057e6823655fb6c5d1f24a28f236b94dd6c54
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-08/msg00001.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39820
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/03/09/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/03/16/10