CVE-2010-0434
What it is
The ap_read_request function in server/protocol.c in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.x before 2.2.15, when a multithreaded MPM is used, does not properly handle headers in subrequests in certain circumstances involving a parent request that has a body, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted request that triggers access to memory locations associated with an earlier request.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 18.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 18.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.3 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 18.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-200 · Information exposure
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Apache Http Server < 2.0.64
- Apache Http Server < 2.2.15
- Fedoraproject Fedora 11
- Fedoraproject Fedora 13
- Debian Linux 5.0
- Debian Linux 6.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-0434.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-0434. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_22.html
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/server/protocol.c?r1=917617&r2=917867&pathrev=917867&diff_format=h
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=917867
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=918427
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48359
- http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_22.html
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/server/protocol.c?r1=917617&r2=917867&pathrev=917867&diff_format=h
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=917867
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=918427
- https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48359
References
- http://httpd.apache.org/security/vulnerabilities_22.html
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//Nov/msg00000.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/039957.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-May/040652.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-04/msg00006.html
- http://lists.vmware.com/pipermail/security-announce/2010/000105.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127557640302499&w=2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39100
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39115
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39501
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39628
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39632
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39656
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40096
- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4435
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/server/protocol.c?r1=917617&r2=917867&pathrev=917867&diff_format=h
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=917867
- http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=918427
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PM08939
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PM12247
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PM15829
- http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2035
- http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujuly2013-1899826.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0168.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0175.html