CVE-2010-0097
What it is
ISC BIND 9.0.x through 9.3.x, 9.4 before 9.4.3-P5, 9.5 before 9.5.2-P2, 9.6 before 9.6.1-P3, and 9.7.0 beta does not properly validate DNSSEC (1) NSEC and (2) NSEC3 records, which allows remote attackers to add the Authenticated Data (AD) flag to a forged NXDOMAIN response for an existing domain.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 9.4% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 9.4% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 4.3 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 9.4% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-20 · Improper input validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Isc Bind 9.0
- Isc Bind 9.0.0
- Isc Bind 9.0.1
- Isc Bind 9.1
- Isc Bind 9.1.0
- Isc Bind 9.1.1
- Isc Bind 9.1.2
- Isc Bind 9.1.3
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 4.3
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- None
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2010-0097.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2010-0097. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38169
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38219
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38240
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0176
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38169
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38219
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38240
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0176
References
- ftp://ftp.sco.com/pub/unixware7/714/security/p535243_uw7/p535243b.txt
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/Security-announce/2011//Oct/msg00003.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-January/034196.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-January/034202.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-01/msg00009.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127195582210247&w=2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38169
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38219
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38240
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39334
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39582
- http://secunia.com/advisories/40086
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1023474
- http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-77-1021798.1-1
- http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5002
- http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Advisories:rPSA-2010-0018
- http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2054
- http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/360341
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:021
- http://www.osvdb.org/61853
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37865
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-888-1
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0176
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0622
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0981