CVE-2009-4536
What it is
drivers/net/e1000/e1000_main.c in the e1000 driver in the Linux kernel 2.6.32.3 and earlier handles Ethernet frames that exceed the MTU by processing certain trailing payload data as if it were a complete frame, which allows remote attackers to bypass packet filters via a large packet with a crafted payload. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2009-1385.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 5.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- ReservedThe CVE id was reserved by its CNA
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 5.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.8 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 5.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-189
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Linux Kernel ≤ 2.6.32.3
- Debian Linux 4.0
- Debian Linux 5.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-4536.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-4536. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://blog.c22.cc/2009/12/27/26c3-cat-procsysnetipv4fuckups/
- http://events.ccc.de/congress/2009/Fahrplan/events/3596.en.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-February/035159.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-01/msg00005.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-01/msg00008.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-02/msg00002.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-02/msg00005.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-02/msg00007.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-03/msg00000.html
- http://marc.info/?t=126203102000001&r=1&w=2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/35265
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38031
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38276
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38296
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38492
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38610
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38779
- http://securitytracker.com/id?1023420
- http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-1996
- http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-2005
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/12/28/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/12/29/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/12/31/1
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0019.html
- http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2010-0020.html