CVE-2009-4355
What it is
Memory leak in the zlib_stateful_finish function in crypto/comp/c_zlib.c in OpenSSL 0.9.8l and earlier and 1.0.0 Beta through Beta 4 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via vectors that trigger incorrect calls to the CRYPTO_cleanup_all_ex_data function, as demonstrated by use of SSLv3 and PHP with the Apache HTTP Server, a related issue to CVE-2008-1678.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 9.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 9.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.0 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 9.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-399
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- OpenSSL ≤ 0.9.8l
- OpenSSL 0.9.1c
- OpenSSL 0.9.2b
- OpenSSL 0.9.3
- OpenSSL 0.9.3a
- OpenSSL 0.9.4
- OpenSSL 0.9.5
- OpenSSL 0.9.5a
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-4355.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-4355. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38175
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38181
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38200
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-884-1
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0124
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38175
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38181
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38200
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-884-1
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0124
References
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19068
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19069
- http://cvs.openssl.org/chngview?cn=19167
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/038587.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/039561.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-01/msg00009.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127128920008563&w=2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38175
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38181
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38200
- http://secunia.com/advisories/38761
- http://secunia.com/advisories/39461
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42724
- http://secunia.com/advisories/42733
- http://slackware.com/security/viewer.php?l=slackware-security&y=2010&m=slackware-security.663049
- http://wiki.rpath.com/wiki/Advisories:rPSA-2010-0004
- http://www.debian.org/security/2010/dsa-1970
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2010:022
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2010/01/13/3
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-884-1
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0124
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0839
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0916
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=546707
- https://issues.rpath.com/browse/RPL-3157