CVE-2009-3895
What it is
Heap-based buffer overflow in the exif_entry_fix function (aka the tag fixup routine) in libexif/exif-entry.c in libexif 0.6.18 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly execute arbitrary code via an invalid EXIF image. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 5.2% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 5.2% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 6.8 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 5.2% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Libexif Project Libexif 0.6.18
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 6.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Partial
- Integrity
- Partial
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-3895.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-3895. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://libexif.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/libexif/libexif/NEWS?view=markup&pathrev=libexif-0_6_19-release
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37378
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3243
- http://libexif.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/libexif/libexif/NEWS?view=markup&pathrev=libexif-0_6_19-release
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37378
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3243
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/557137
- http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293190
- http://libexif.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/libexif/libexif/NEWS?view=markup&pathrev=libexif-0_6_19-release
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37378
- http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=20091113072359.GA22681%40coneharvesters.com
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/11/19/2
- http://www.osvdb.org/59956
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37022
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3243
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/54275
- http://bugs.debian.org/557137
- http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=293190
- http://libexif.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/libexif/libexif/NEWS?view=markup&pathrev=libexif-0_6_19-release
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37378
- http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=20091113072359.GA22681%40coneharvesters.com
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/11/19/2
- http://www.osvdb.org/59956
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/37022
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/3243
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/54275