CVE-2009-3695
What it is
Algorithmic complexity vulnerability in the forms library in Django 1.0 before 1.0.4 and 1.1 before 1.1.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a crafted (1) EmailField (email address) or (2) URLField (URL) that triggers a large amount of backtracking in a regular expression.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 3.8% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 3.8% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 5.0 MEDIUM (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 3.8% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Djangoproject Django 1.0
- Djangoproject Django 1.1
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 5.0
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-3695.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-3695. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36948
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36968
- http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2009/oct/09/security/
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36655
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2871
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36948
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36968
- http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2009/oct/09/security/
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36655
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2871
References
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=550457
- http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_thread/thread/15df9e45118dfc51/
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36948
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36968
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1905
- http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2009/oct/09/security/
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/10/13/6
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36655
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2871
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/53727
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=550457
- http://groups.google.com/group/django-users/browse_thread/thread/15df9e45118dfc51/
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36948
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36968
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1905
- http://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2009/oct/09/security/
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/10/13/6
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36655
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2871
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/53727