CVE-2009-3555
What it is
The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert data into HTTPS sessions, and possibly other types of sessions protected by TLS or SSL, by sending an unauthenticated request that is processed retroactively by a server in a post-renegotiation context, related to a "plaintext injection" attack, aka the "Project Mogul" issue.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 87.3% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS). Higher than most.
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- ReservedThe CVE id was reserved by its CNA
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 87.3% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 9.8 CRITICAL (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
- It meets the bar for Drop everything: critical, and exploited or very likely to be.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 87.3% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-295 · Improper certificate validation
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Apache Http Server ≤ 2.2.14
- Gnu Gnutls ≤ 2.8.5
- Mozilla Nss ≤ 3.12.4
- OpenSSL ≤ 0.9.8k
- OpenSSL 1.0
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 8.04
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 8.10
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 9.04
Attack profile CVSS 3.1 · 9.8
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-3555.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-3555. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36935
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2010/ms10-049
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36935
- https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2010/ms10-049
References
- http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/bugtraq/2013-11/0120.html
- http://blog.g-sec.lu/2009/11/tls-sslv3-renegotiation-vulnerability.html
- http://blogs.iss.net/archive/sslmitmiscsrf.html
- http://blogs.sun.com/security/entry/vulnerability_in_tls_protocol_during
- http://clicky.me/tlsvuln
- http://extendedsubset.com/?p=8
- http://extendedsubset.com/Renegotiating_TLS.pdf
- http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c01945686
- http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?objectID=c02436041
- http://itrc.hp.com/service/cki/docDisplay.do?docId=emr_na-c02273751
- http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/docs/DOC-20491
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//May/msg00001.html
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010//May/msg00002.html
- http://lists.apple.com/archives/security-announce/2010/Jan/msg00000.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/039561.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-April/039957.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-May/040652.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-October/049455.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-October/049528.html
- http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2010-October/049702.html
- http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnutls-devel/2009-11/msg00029.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-11/msg00009.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-04/msg00001.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-05/msg00001.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-05/msg00002.html