CVE-2009-3094
What it is
The ap_proxy_ftp_handler function in modules/proxy/proxy_ftp.c in the mod_proxy_ftp module in the Apache HTTP Server 2.0.63 and 2.2.13 allows remote FTP servers to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and child process crash) via a malformed reply to an EPSV command.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. Limited direct impact.
- Exploit odds
- 8.6% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 8.6% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 2.6 LOW (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 8.6% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-476 · NULL pointer dereference
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Apache Http Server < 2.0.64
- Apache Http Server < 2.2.14
- Fedoraproject Fedora 10
- Fedoraproject Fedora 12
- Debian Linux 4.0
- Debian Linux 5.0
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 2.6
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Partial
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:H/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-3094.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-3094. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36549
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37152
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0609
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36549
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37152
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0609
References
- http://intevydis.com/vd-list.shtml
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-10/msg00006.html
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=126998684522511&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=127557640302499&w=2
- http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=133355494609819&w=2
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36549
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37152
- http://wiki.rpath.com/Advisories:rPSA-2009-0155
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PK96858
- http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PM09161
- http://www.debian.org/security/2009/dsa-1934
- http://www.intevydis.com/blog/?p=59
- http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/508075/100/0/threaded
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0609
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521619
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/54a42d4b01968df1117cea77fc53d6beb931c0e05936ad02af93e9ac%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5df9bfb86a3b054bb985a45ff9250b0332c9ecc181eec232489e7f79%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/8d63cb8e9100f28a99429b4328e4e7cebce861d5772ac9863ba2ae6f%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f7f95ac1cd9895db2714fa3ebaa0b94d0c6df360f742a40951384a53%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r0276683d8e1e07153fc8642618830ac0ade85b9ae0dc7b07f63bb8fc%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2295080a257bad27ea68ca0af12fc715577f9e84801eae116a33107e%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r2cb985de917e7da0848c440535f65a247754db8b2154a10089e4247b%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r57608dc51b79102f3952ae06f54d5277b649c86d6533dcd6a7d201f7%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r5f9c22f9c28adbd9f00556059edc7b03a5d5bb71d4bb80257c0d34e4%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E
- https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r75cbe9ea3e2114e4271bbeca7aff96117b50c1b6eb7c4772b0337c1f%40%3Ccvs.httpd.apache.org%3E