CVE-2009-2903
What it is
Memory leak in the appletalk subsystem in the Linux kernel 2.4.x through 2.4.37.6 and 2.6.x through 2.6.31, when the appletalk and ipddp modules are loaded but the ipddp"N" device is not found, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) via IP-DDP datagrams.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited over the network without logging in. High risk of service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 3.8% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- No patch or advisory is linked yet. Look at mitigations or restrict exposure.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 3.8% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.1 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: none linked yet, which raises it.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 3.8% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-772
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Linux Kernel ≤ 2.4.37.6
- Linux Kernel ≤ 2.6.31
- Suse Linux Enterprise Debuginfo 10
- Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop 10
- Suse Linux Enterprise Server 9
- Suse Linux Enterprise Server 10
- Suse Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit 10
- Canonical Ubuntu Linux 6.06
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.1
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Medium
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-2903.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-2903. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
References
- http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=ffcfb8db540ff879c2a85bf7e404954281443414
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-12/msg00002.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-12/msg00005.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-02/msg00005.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-02/msg00007.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36707
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37105
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37909
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:329
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/09/14/1
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/09/14/2
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/09/17/11
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36379
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-852-1
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=522331
- http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=ffcfb8db540ff879c2a85bf7e404954281443414
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-12/msg00002.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2009-12/msg00005.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-02/msg00005.html
- http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-02/msg00007.html
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36707
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37105
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37909
- http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2009:329
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/09/14/1