CVE-2009-2767
What it is
The init_posix_timers function in kernel/posix-timers.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.31-rc6 allows local users to cause a denial of service (OOPS) or possibly gain privileges via a CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW clock_nanosleep call that triggers a NULL pointer dereference.
At a glance
- Exploitability
- Can be exploited locally on the machine without logging in. High risk of data exposure, data tampering, service disruption.
- Exploit odds
- 0.7% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Fix
- A patch, advisory or fixed version is referenced. Upgrade or apply it.
Timeline
- PublishedDisclosed publicly on CVE.org and NVD
- Last updatedMost recent change to the record
Why it ranks here
- Exploited in the wild: no, CISA does not list it.
- Exploit odds: 0.7% in the next 30 days (EPSS).
- Severity: 7.2 HIGH (CVSS).
- Fix: a patch or advisory is linked.
Details
- Published
- Last modified
- Exploit probability
- 0.7% · EPSS, next 30 days
- Weakness
- CWE-119 · Buffer errors
- Record status
- Modified
Affected
- Linux Kernel 2.6.24.7
- Linux Kernel 2.6.25.15
- Linux Kernel ≤ 2.6.16.31
- Linux Kernel 2.6
- Linux Kernel 2.6.0
- Linux Kernel 2.6.1
- Linux Kernel 2.6.10
- Linux Kernel 2.6.11
Attack profile CVSS 2.0 · 7.2
- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Authentication
- None
- Confidentiality
- Complete
- Integrity
- Complete
- Availability
- Complete
Raw vector
AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C
Is it in your code?
Hand this to your coding agent. It searches your project for the affected products and checks versions. Nothing leaves your machine.
Read https://cve-list.com/agent/cve/CVE-2009-2767.md and follow it. Check whether this project is affected by CVE-2009-2767. Read only. Don't change anything and don't upload my code. Tell me yes, no or not sure, with the file as proof.
Fix and advisories
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/4/28
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/4/40
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36200
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2197
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/4/28
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/4/40
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36200
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2197
References
- http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=70d715fd0597f18528f389b5ac59102263067744
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/4/28
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/4/40
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36200
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37105
- http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/ChangeLog-2.6.31-rc6
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/08/06/2
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-852-1
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2197
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/52317
- http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git%3Ba=commit%3Bh=70d715fd0597f18528f389b5ac59102263067744
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/4/28
- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/4/40
- http://secunia.com/advisories/36200
- http://secunia.com/advisories/37105
- http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/ChangeLog-2.6.31-rc6
- http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/08/06/2
- http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/USN-852-1
- http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2197
- https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/52317